Devil Canyon Project, Alaska, Denali Dam site, inflow design flood study reconnaissance.

This memorandum was written in response to a request on Oct. 22, 1958 to conduct inflow design flood studies for the Devil Canyon Project. This study makes recommendation for the maximum mean daily discharge at the Denali Dam site (located on the Susitna River just south of N 63°). This report belon...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Alternate Title:Title on memorandum subject line: Inflow design flood study Denali Dam site, Devil Canyon Project, Alaska
Main Author: Miller, Donald L.
Corporate Contributor(s):United States. Bureau of Reclamation. Hydrology Branch.

United States. Bureau of Reclamation. Flood Hydrology Section.
Publisher:Hydrology Branch, Div. of Project Invest. [i.e. Investigations, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation],
Report Numbers:APA 4111
Subjects:
Online Access:Link to Full Text
Library Holdings:Print Versions
LEADER 03380cam a2200541Ia 4500
001 1475102
003 SIRSI
005 20160609114808.0
007 ta
007 cr bn||||a||||
008 101207s1959 couabdf f000 0 eng d
040 |a RLA  |b eng  |c RLA  |d RLA  |d OCLCO  |d RLA  |d OCLCF  |d OCLCQ  |d OCLCO  |d RLA 
035 |a (OCoLC)690343458 
043 |a n-us-ak 
050 4 |a TK1425.S8  |b A23 no. 4111 
088 |a APA 4111 
049 |a RLAA 
100 1 |a Miller, Donald L. 
245 1 0 |a Devil Canyon Project, Alaska, Denali Dam site, inflow design flood study reconnaissance. 
246 1 |i Title on memorandum subject line:  |a Inflow design flood study Denali Dam site, Devil Canyon Project, Alaska 
260 |a Denver :  |b Hydrology Branch, Div. of Project Invest. [i.e. Investigations, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation],  |c [1959] 
300 |a 2, 7 leaves, 6 leaves of plates :  |b 5 graphs, 1 map ;  |c 28 cm 
336 |a text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a unmediated  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a volume  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a A memorandum addressed to Head, Flood Hydrology Section, from Donald L. Miller, dated April 21, 1959 on p. [1]. 
500 |a Accompanied by a two-page letter of transmittal addressed to Bureau of Reclamation District Manager, Juneau, Alaska, from Chief Development Engineer, hand-dated Apr. 23, 1959. 
500 |a "Apr. 1959." 
510 3 |a Alaska Resources Library and Information Services has assigned APA no. 4111 to this document for the Susitna Hydroelectric Project collection. 
530 |a Available also in electronic format on the Internet. 
520 |a This memorandum was written in response to a request on Oct. 22, 1958 to conduct inflow design flood studies for the Devil Canyon Project. This study makes recommendation for the maximum mean daily discharge at the Denali Dam site (located on the Susitna River just south of N 63°). This report belongs to a group of early reports of the anticipated Susitna Hydroelectric Project. 
588 |a Cataloging based on copy that is difficult to read; letter of transmittal is almost unreadable. 
650 0 |a Flood control  |z Alaska  |z Susitna River. 
650 0 |a Streamflow  |z Alaska  |z Susitna River. 
610 2 0 |a Devil Canyon Project. 
610 2 0 |a Susitna Hydroelectric Project. 
651 4 |a Denali Dam (Alaska : Proposed) 
610 2 7 |a Devil Canyon Project.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00752458 
610 2 7 |a Susitna Hydroelectric Project.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00592845 
650 7 |a Flood control.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst00927443 
650 7 |a Streamflow.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01134618 
651 7 |a Alaska  |z Susitna River.  |2 fast  |0 (OCoLC)fst01246005 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Bureau of Reclamation.  |b Hydrology Branch. 
710 1 |a United States.  |b Bureau of Reclamation.  |b Flood Hydrology Section. 
856 4 1 |u https://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/Susitna/41/APA4111.pdf  |z ARLIS Document Server 
596 |a 9 10 
098 |a APA 04111 
590 |a ARLIS: The plates in both the volume containing the entire text and in the PDF file were made from an earlier generation of reproduced plates (sometimes divided into multiple sheets), which is how the report was originally distributed. Plates in the circulating book have been assembled and photoreproduced. ARLIS is keeping a set of this earlier generation for preservation, although this set itself is of poor quality.