AGDC defends LNG site selection, calls Mat-Su claims 'baseless'
Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC) denies it failed to undertake a good-faith analysis of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough?s Port MacKenzie as an alternative to building the gas liquefaction plant in Nikiski for the Alaska LNG Project. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough strongly advocates its sit...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Document Type: | Press release |
| Publisher: | Alaska Resources Library and Information Services (ARLIS) |
| Date: | October 5, 2018 |
| Series: | Alaska LNG Project updates
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View Full Text View Full Text |
| Library Holdings: | Print Versions |
| Summary: | Alaska Gasline Development Corporation (AGDC) denies it failed to undertake a good-faith analysis of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough?s Port MacKenzie as an alternative to building the gas liquefaction plant in Nikiski for the Alaska LNG Project. The Matanuska-Susitna Borough strongly advocates its site and disagrees with AGDC's analysis. The environmental impact statement from FERC, due soon, must consider feasible alternatives. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | 3 p. |
| Notes: | This update is provided to keep the public informed about the Alaska LNG Project. |