Denali Park pipeline routing waits on congressional action
The routing of the proposed Alaska LNG Project natural gas pipeline through the Alaska Range is contingent on environmental analysis by federal agencies and congressional action. There are benefits of running the pipeline through Denali National Park and Preserve, which is generally supported by pub...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Document Type: | Press release |
| Publisher: | Kenai Peninsula Borough. Mayor's Office |
| Date: | November 30, 2016 |
| Bills/Acts; Orders; Treaties: | Denali National Park Improvement Act of 2013 Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) |
| Series: | Alaska LNG Project updates
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | View Full Text View Full Text |
| Library Holdings: | Print Versions |
| LEADER | 02200cam a22003733 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 2947323 | ||
| 003 | SIRSI | ||
| 008 | 161130s2016 o 000 0 eng u | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Persily, Larry | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Denali Park pipeline routing waits on congressional action |
| 260 | |a Kenai Peninsula Borough. Mayor's Office | ||
| 264 | |a 20161130 | ||
| 300 | |a 4 pages | ||
| 380 | |a Press release | ||
| 490 | |a Alaska LNG Project updates | ||
| 518 | |a November 30, 2016 | ||
| 546 | |a English | ||
| 500 | |a This update is provided to keep the public informed about the Alaska LNG Project. | ||
| 520 | |a The routing of the proposed Alaska LNG Project natural gas pipeline through the Alaska Range is contingent on environmental analysis by federal agencies and congressional action. There are benefits of running the pipeline through Denali National Park and Preserve, which is generally supported by public and agency comments. Otherwise, there are serious construction problems to resolve in the alternative route. Senator Lisa Murkowski succeeded in adding an amendment to an energy bill, S. 2012, that would amend the Denali National Park Improvement Act of 2013 and ANILCA that would remove the ANILCA provision requiring a separate review and approval process. The EPA and Denali Borough government support the alternative Parks Highway route, but the Alaska State Historic Preservation Office does not. | ||
| 610 | 2 | |a Alaska LNG Project | |
| 653 | |a Routing | ||
| 653 | |a Government policy | ||
| 653 | |a Legislation | ||
| 653 | |a Review comments | ||
| 651 | |a Denali National Park and Preserve | ||
| 600 | 1 | |a Murkowski, Lisa | |
| 610 | 2 | |a Alaska State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) | |
| 610 | 2 | |a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) | |
| 697 | |a Denali National Park Improvement Act of 2013 | ||
| 697 | |a Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA) | ||
| 690 | |a PF-USPROJ | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/AlaskaGas/News/News_Persily-KPB_2016_DenaliParkPipelineRoutingWaits.pdf |3 Direct link to this update |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://www.arlis.org/docs/vol1/AlaskaGas/News/News_KPB_AK_LNG_ProjectUpdate.html |3 Website listing all Project updates |
| 596 | |a 10 | ||